“In football, the object is for the quarterback, otherwise known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use the shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy’s defensive line.”
“In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! “I hope I’ll be safe at home!”
–George Carlin “Baseball v. Football”
I’ve always loved this routine by George Carlin. It’s probably a good indicator of why I love baseball and barely tolerate football. (I’m also reminded of the George Will quote “Football combines the two worst aspects of American life: violence and committee meetings.”)
The unrelenting war in Iraq, the use (and legal justification ) of torture by the Bush Administration and the incessant drumbeat of horror on daily newscasts has made me much more aware of how militarism seeps into our daily lives. The most recent example has been my recognition of the constant use of war rhetoric to describe the activities of my chosen profession, a community organizer for a grassroots neighborhood organization.
I am as guilty of these habits as anyone. Our activities are called campaigns, they are pursued by our troops and our actions are called fights, battles and wars. Those who dare oppose us are enemies. The words roll easily off the tongue and are incorporated into flyers, posters and handouts. What really made me face this problem was an article in the most recent edition of Disclosure. This newspaper is published by the national coalition of neighborhood groups to which SUN belongs, National People’s Action. The director of the group that facilitates the coalition wrote a column entitled
Taking A Lesson From The Past. The lesson of the article is very upfront: “I believe that community organizing is a war.”
I hold the director in high esteem and I am not second guessing the message behind the words, but the words themselves are troubling. The bulk of the article is an explanantion of how our neighborhood groups can learn from the military experiences of ancient Carthaginian leader Hannibal Barca. I understand the internal logic of the piece; basic strategies like coalition building and negotiation can be analyzed and improved upon by studying the activities of groups quite unlike ourselves, even those from different periods of history.
My question is simple, why are we always studying for war when we are attempting to bring peace to our communities? Why are we studying slave holders who used weapons and shed blood to achieve their goals? Quite frankly, I’m getting all of this I can tolerate when I turn on CNN and am forced to learn of the latest atrocities in Falujah, Kabul and Baghdad.
It’s not like we lack for non-violent role models from our history to study. Gandhi organized his countrymen to defeat the world’s largest colonial power without firing a shot. Martin Luther King, Jr. organized a vast group of oppressed and exploited people to stand up and proclaim a new day of peace and tolerance. John Lennon manipulated his fame to use the media as an unwitting partner in his attempts to put peace before war. All of the freedom movements of the past fifty years, both in America and around the world, have created heroes to emulate and strategies to study.
In the words of the blues musician Willie Dixon:
“Won’t that be one mighty day
When we hear world leaders say
“We don’t have to cry no more”
“We’re givin’ it up, we gonna let it all go”
Ain’t gonna study, study war no more
Ain’t gonna think, think war no more
Ain’t gonna fight, fight war no more
We’re givin’ it up, we gonna let it go
We’re givin’ it up, we gonna let it go.”
–Ain’t Gonna Study War No More